





When stocks rise very quickly, their prices often run far ahead of the company’s actual earnings growth. In these situations, investors are usually reacting to momentum, hype, or optimism rather than the firm’s future earnings potential. For example, in recent years we’ve seen companies surge in value despite producing only modest profits—or even losses—creating a disconnect between price and fundamentals. As the stock climbs without corresponding earnings increases, the valuation multiple (such as the P/E ratio) expands, making the stock more fragile and increasing the likelihood of future price declines if expectations aren’t met.
High P/E ratios can and often do come crashing down. History is full of examples where lofty valuations could not be justified over time. The dot-com boom of the late 1990s featured countless companies trading at extreme multiples before collapsing. More recently, meme stocks like GameStop and AMC saw their prices disconnect from their underlying earnings, leading to sharp reversals. Even major tech companies have experienced steep drops when exuberant valuations corrected back toward reality. These examples highlight how dangerous rapid P/E expansion can be when not supported by real, sustainable earnings growth.
This is the closest match to what you described.
This is why many analysts say:
“Future expected returns are lower when starting valuations are high.”
This refers to the risk that a stock’s valuation multiple (P/E, P/S, EV/EBITDA, etc.) is artificially high and could contract in the future.
Used when the expansion is extreme and not tied to fundamentals.
Examples include:
This is a behavioral explanation, not strictly a valuation term, but it is very relevant:
A stock rises because investors believe they can sell it to a “greater fool” later — even when fundamentals don’t justify the price.

